The Brain of Phil is a project of analysis. In this blog, I aim to provide brilliant insights into the world of technology by seeking out relationships between various stories. This includes analysis of books I read and web pages that I view. I'll also comment occasionally on other interests, including travel, education, and sports.

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

The Digital World Consciousness

The mind is a wonderful thing, but what is the potential extent of that wonder?

In recent weeks, I have been reading a number of books that relate to the question of world networking. For instance, I read the book Linked by Albert Laszlo Barabasi of the University of Notre Dame. It describes the power of networks in every aspect of life, from microbiology to computer networks to social networks of people. What was particularly striking about this book was the point that networks make it possible for any two nodes to relate to each other through a relatively short path. For instance, let's say I wanted the autograph of my favorite baseball player, Albert Pujols of the St. Louis Cardinals. Assuming I don't already know him, how would I go about doing that?

First, I would need to think of one person I do know who most likely could lead me to my destination (Pujols). I would think of my friend Terry, who works in the sports department for the Toronto Sun. He probably doesn't know Pujols, but he would at least know a senior sports writer for the Blue Jays, who in turn would know a sports writer for the St. Louis Cardinals. That person would know Pujols, and in theory could ask for his autograph on my behalf. That's four degrees of separation, or put another way, Albert Pujols is only four people removed from becoming my acquaintance.

The point is that networking allows for close connectedness to the world all around us. The Internet and the World Wide Web are obviously important here, which brings me to another book that I have just begun reading, Multimedia: From Wagner to Virtual Reality. This is an anthology of essays written by people over the past century or more about the power of multimedia to free the imagination and creativity of the human mind.

Without having read much of the book, I can already see where this is leading. The concept of hyper-linking, as we experience when we surf the Internet somewhat randomly by clicking links, is that we create our own experience of the world. We collect information in a manner that we choose, process it in our unique ways, and sometimes we put our new thoughts back out onto the Web for others to digest. In fact, that is what I am doing now with this blog, contributing my own unique thought processes back into cyberspace, where potentially anyone else in the world (because of the Internet) can read what I have to say.

Just imagine what that means for the collective consciousness of mankind. Basically, we are moving to a point where we could be sharing the mind-processing power of billions of human brains toward creative solutions of our problems. As Marshall McLuhan stated in Understanding Media, "after more than a century of electric technology, we have extended our central nervous system itself in a global embrace, abolishing both space and time as far as our planet is concerned."

So where are we heading? This is the question that interests me and drives me toward my future study and research goals in the field of multimedia. Basically, I see a number of things happening that are shaping the digital world consciousness, as I like to call it.

First, the World Wide Web is growing exponentially, so man's collective mind is being made available for all to witness. Potentially scary, yes, so we have to be careful about what we put out in cyberspace for others to read. For the moment, though, let's say that we have the ability to publish our thoughts for the world to read if we so choose.

But all that information is simply overwhelming to process. This is where the second component of the digital world consciousness comes into play - search engines. The number one search technology today is obviously Google. They are doing the best job, although still incomplete, of indexing the World Wide Web (and, thus, the thoughts of people).

Next is making that information accessible anywhere, anytime. People are not always at their computers, but increasingly they are staying connected through the use of portable devices, such as cell phones, PDAs, and media devices such as iPods. Wireless and satellite technologies are allowing people with these devices to access and even upload information from anywhere. Google's efforts to blanket entire cities with wi-fi access show how the time is coming when we can literally be connected to the digital world consciousness at all times.

An interesting, ongoing project on the World Wide Web is the Wikipedia project. It is an effort to obtain the largest known collection of human knowledge by allowing anyone and everyone to contribute articles. Already, the size and scope of Wikipedia greatly surpasses that of any conventional encyclopedia. And it keeps growing, everyday.

Even as these developments take place, they will repeat themselves in greater, more meaningful forms as multimedia applications become more sophisticated. Virtual reality is an idea whose time is arriving, but its potential has not yet been realized. Once virtual worlds become ubiquitous, we are going to see a whole new stage of human mind processing.

Our world is growing ever smaller, yet the potential for creativity and thought interaction grows at a pace that is hard to conceive. We do live in a globalized world, and we are much more closely connected to each other than we ever dreamed of. The digital world consciousness is, I believe, where we are heading. Although we must be careful about how we exploit this capability (surely that is a field that must grow along side the development of multimedia technology), the potential for combining the brain power of all the Earth's people is a marvelous thing to contemplate.

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Apple iPod: Media hub?

This article on CNN.com caught my attention early today. In essence, analysts believe that the iPod will become a media storage hub for music, photos, TV shows, and movies. Well, the new video-enabled iPod already has that capability, but the new estimates suggest that iPods will hold a terabyte of storage within five years.

Hopefully, if this is true (which is thoroughly plausible, I believe), the screen will be larger than the one the current iPod has. As well, something will have to be done about the on-screen resolution of the video files being offered through iTunes, which currently sits at 320x240 pixels -- good enough for the iPod, but not so great when viewed on a computer or TV screen.

Thursday, November 10, 2005

The question everybody asks

Ultimately, family members and friends want to know what I plan to do when I go to Australia. Here is what I can say about that.

We (Heather, the kids, and I) are going to Australia to start the next phase of our lives. Korea has been very important to me for many reasons, but we want the kids to go to school in an English-speaking country. So why not Canada? Well, it comes down to what I want to do. I want to get into a career that involves technology. At first, I was sure that I wanted to be a professor of instructional technology; now, though, that is just one option I am looking at. The other option is to go into industry doing things like developing e-learning solutions.

Canada is kind of funny in this regard. It is a high-tech country to be sure, but the education system isn't really behind it (as far as I can tell). No doctoral programs in instructional technology can be found at any of the major universities that I have researched. If I want to do a program in digital technology, all I've found thus far are college diploma programs. So I just don't see Canada being the answer to get me where I want to go.

Australia, on the other hand, offers exactly the kind of graduate school programs that interest me. I can do a master's degree and gain industry contacts at the same time. Then I can go on and do a PhD in instructional technology if I so desire. So that explains why I am more interested in Australia than Canada at this time.

Beyond school, what do I plan to do? Well, like I said, I think industry is a good starting point. By this, I mean that I might try to get into a company that is working on educational products for computers or portable electronic devices, or I could try to do my own start-up company for this purpose. If that goes well, then I will see how busy I am. I would love to complete a PhD program, as well, since this would then make academia a distinct possibility, but I'd have to see if I had the time to do it.

I have many ideas in my head for developing multimedia solutions for the educational market place, but it doesn't end there. I could also see myself working on things like interactive travel guides that work on portable devices.

It IS possible that we might return to Canada some day. If the right opportunity arises, we will always be ready to make the move. But Heather and I agree that we have to do what is right for us, and we just hope to be successful at it so that we can enable ourselves to travel, visit our home countries, and maybe even some day return home for good. Time will tell.

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Six thinking hats... and ECU

Here's an intellectual exercise for myself: applying the Six Thinking Hats method to my question of which program to apply for at ECU (Edith Cowan University).

Issue: Which program at ECU is better for me in the short term?
  • Master of Professional Communications (Interactive Multimedia Technologies), or
  • a research Ph.D. in the Centre of Schooling and Learning Technologies (CSaLT).
White Hat (just the facts)
  • The Masters is 1.5 years; Ph.D. is 2-4 years
  • Masters: School of Communications and Multimedia; Ph.D.: Centre of Schooling and Learning Technologies
  • Masters: course work and industry project; Ph.D.: research only
  • Course start: Masters starts in February or July; Ph.D. has ongoing enrollment throughout the year
  • Job prospects: Masters gets you contacts in industry; Ph.D. sets you up for academia
  • ECU is located in Perth, Western Australia
  • Western Australia has a special program that allows international post-grad students in research programs (masters or doctorate) to send their dependant children to public school for free
Red Hat (my feelings)
  • Both programs excite me
  • I'm not yet sure if the Master of Professional Communications program is eligible for the free schooling for my kids, so that concerns me
  • Both programs deal with topics that I have wanted to learn more about, so I want to do both
  • I'm concerned about money... can I afford these programs?
  • I love the idea of going to Australia and getting a job either as a professor or going into industry, maybe even starting my own company
  • Right now, I just think that the smart thing to do would be to do the Masters first, and then see if I would like to do the Ph.D. later

Black Hat (caution)
  • I won't be working full-time for at least one and a half years. Can we afford this?
  • The Ph.D. will require so much of my time that I won't be able to work much or spend much quality time with my family during my studies
  • The Masters starts in February, although starting July is possible. Does this mean I should start in February, because I want to finish my JLS contract first (April)
  • Ph.D.: can I handle the expectations of high-level research?
  • Right now, I don't know if there are any scholarship opportunities for the Masters program

Yellow Hat (positive thinking)
  • Either program will greatly benefit me: the Masters will give me hands-on experience making multimedia products, and the Ph.D. will involve doing high-level research into the use of technology in education
  • There should be good job opportunities associated with both programs
  • I will make contacts with important people in both programs (both programs involve working with people in industry or schools)
  • The Ph.D. deals with many issues that I want to study, and may give me the chance to use my expertise in other countries, including Canada
  • Completion of either program should greatly increase my odds of being granted permanent residence, which will allow us to stay in Australia
  • As well, getting permanent residence should decrease the cost of tuition if I do the other program later
  • There are scholarship opportunities for the Ph.D. program; part-time work (up to 8 hours per week) in the Ph.D. program, including lecturing that pays about $100/hour

Green Hat (creativity and new ideas)
  • After doing the masters, I could try to form a company that develops multimedia resources for the Web or for portable devices
  • I should join as many associations as possible after graduation to increase my networking opportunities and points total for getting permanent residence
  • With either degree, I could possibly go back to Canada and apply my knowledge there
  • With the Ph.D. and some work experience in Australia, I could return to Canada and help develop similar instructional technology programs for Canadian universities; consulting

Blue Hat (overview of everything)
  • This is an introduction to my thought process, which will be ongoing
  • I will have to decide which program to apply for first
  • As I collect more information, my thoughts will evolve, maybe even to the point where I consider other options